Symbolic AI: The key to the thinking machine

Neural|Symbolic—uses a neural architecture to interpret perceptual data as symbols and relationships that are then reasoned about symbolically. Because it is a rule-based reasoning system, Symbolic AI also enables its developers to easily visualize the logic behind its decisions. In case of a problem, developers can follow its behavior line by line and investigate errors down to the machine instruction where they occurred. Being able to communicate in symbols is one of the main things that make us intelligent.

In fact, rule-based AI systems are still very important in today’s applications. Many leading scientists believe that symbolic reasoning will continue to remain a very important component of artificial intelligence. Symbolic AI involves the explicit embedding of human knowledge and behavior rules into computer programs. The practice showed a lot of promise in the early decades of AI research. But in recent years, as neural networks, also known as connectionist AI, gained traction, symbolic AI has fallen by the wayside. To analyze the street scenes, SingularityNET and Cisco make use of the OpenCog AGI engine along with deep neural networks.

Logical Neural Networks (LNN)

The summer school will include talks from over 25 IBMers in various areas of theory and the application of neuro-symbolic AI. We will also have a distinguished external speaker to share an overview of neuro-symbolic AI and its history. The agenda is a balance of educational content on neuro-symbolic AI and a discussion of recent results. While subsymbolic AI is developed because of the shortcomings of the symbolic AI paradigm, they can be used as complementary paradigms.

symbolic ai programs rely on creating explicit structures and behavior rules. The ability to communicate using symbols is one of the main things which make us smart. Therefore, symbols have also played an essential role in developing artificial intelligence. Rich cognitive models that work together with those mechanisms and knowledge bases.”

Problems with symbolic artificial intelligence

These models can be designed and trained with relatively less effort compared to their accuracy performance. However, one of the biggest shortcomings of subsymbolic models is the explainability of the decision-making process. Especially in sensitive fields where reasoning is an indispensable property of the outcome (e.g., court rulings, military actions, loan applications), we cannot rely on high-performing but opaque models.

• On the other hand, the subsymbolic AI paradigm provides very successful models.
• When we look at an image, such as a stack of blocks, we will have a rough idea of whether it will resist gravity or topple.
• Deep learning has several deep challenges and disadvantages in comparison to symbolic AI.
• The focus is on the integration of the two paradigms in a complementary manner rather than on the complete replacement of one paradigm by another.
• The main assumption of the subsymbolic paradigm is that the ability to extract a good model with limited experience makes a model successful.
• In this work, we demonstrate NSQA, which is a realization of a hybrid “neuro-symbolic” approach.

It’s not a complete list of industries where computer engineers use symbolic AI. VentureBeat’s mission is to be a digital town square for technical decision-makers to gain knowledge about transformative enterprise technology and transact. He previously led communications and recruiting at the Sequoia-backed robo-advisor, FutureAdvisor, which was acquired by BlackRock. In a prior life, Chris spent a decade reporting on tech and finance for The New York Times, Businessweek and Bloomberg, among others. 2) The two problems may overlap, and solving one could lead to solving the other, since a concept that helps explain a model will also help it recognize certain patterns in data using fewer examples.

No Reasoning Capabilities

Maybe in the future, we’ll invent AI technologies that can both reason and learn. But for the moment, symbolic AI is the leading method to deal with problems that require logical thinking and knowledge representation. Also, some tasks can’t be translated to direct rules, including speech recognition and natural language processing. But symbolic AI starts to break when you must deal with the messiness of the world. For instance, consider computer vision, the science of enabling computers to make sense of the content of images and video.

In fact, the idea dates back to the late 1980s and early 1990s, when the first series of workshops on this topic occurred. Until now, while we talked a lot about symbols and concepts, there was no mention of language. Tenenbaum explained in his talk that language is deeply grounded in the unspoken commonsense knowledge that we acquire before we learn to speak. AI agents should be able to reason and plan their actions based on mental representations they develop of the world and other agents through intuitive physics and theory of mind. If we are to observe the thought process and reasoning of human beings, we will be able to find out that human beings use symbols as a crucial part of the entire communication process .

Symbolic AI

Say you have a picture of your cat and want to create a program that can detect images that contain your cat. You create a rule-based program that takes new images as inputs, compares the pixels to the original cat image, and responds by saying whether your cat is in those images. In one of their projects, Tenenbaum and hi AI system was able to parse a scene and use a probabilistic model that produce a step-by-step set of symbolic instructions to solve physics problems.

But the benefits of deep learning and neural networks are not without tradeoffs. Deep learning has several deep challenges and disadvantages in comparison to symbolic AI. Notably, deep learning algorithms are opaque, and figuring out how they work perplexes even their creators. And it’s very hard to communicate and troubleshoot their inner-workings.

Popular on Neural

At Bosch, he focuses on neuro-symbolic reasoning for decision support systems. Alessandro’s primary interest is to investigate how semantic resources can be integrated with data-driven algorithms, and help humans and machines make sense of the physical and digital worlds. Alessandro holds a PhD in Cognitive Science from the University of Trento .

Soon, more projects may use symbolic AI in a broader concept with neural networks to conduct rigorous analysis and compare large amounts of data to determine correlations to training systems. It’s easy to imagine a future where artificial intelligence algorithms have innate abilities to learn and think clearly. Nowadays, we must accept that symbolic AI is the best way to solve problems that require knowledge representation and logical processes. For organizations looking forward to the day they can interact with AI just like a person, symbolic AI is how it will happen, says tech journalist Surya Maddula.